"Bug in ModelApplier?"

xilefxilef MemberPosts:2Contributor I
edited May 2019 inHelp
Hi,

I think there's a bug in ModelApplier which causes the wrong ID to appear in certain rows.
Attached are 2 screenshots: one shows the dataset before ModelApplier (breakpoint) and another after ModelApplier.

Notice how the ID for Row 868 is the wrong one (identical to Row 866) ?
我看起来像是一个错误但我RapidMiner newbie so maybe I'm doing something wrong.

Maybe this is related, I get for the ExampleSet: "ExampleSource (2): The ID attribute 'item_id' is defined with a nominal value type but the possible values are not defined ..."
This is strange because I defined 'item_id' as string and not nominal:

name = "item_id"
sourcecol = "1"
valuetype = "string"/>

Please advise, thanks.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Tagged:

Answers

  • steffensteffen MemberPosts:347Maven
    Hello xilef

    Yes, I think this is a bug already occured. See this thread:*click*

    Maybe this is related, I get for the ExampleSet: "ExampleSource (2): The ID attribute 'item_id' is defined with a nominal value type but the possible values are not defined ..."
    This is strange because I defined 'item_id' as string and not nominal:
    I dont think so. Valuetype=string implies nominal. Normally the ExampleSource-operator expects that all possible values for the nominal attribute are documented in the aml-file. Example:
    name = "Outlook"
    sourcecol = "1"
    valuetype = "nominal">
    rain
    overcast
    sunny
    But this has (as far as I see) nothing to do with the bug.

    Hope the workaround in the mentioned thread above is helping you, too

    greetings,

    Steffen
  • xilefxilef MemberPosts:2Contributor I
    Hi Steffen,

    Thanks for the workaround, I'll try it.

    I hope this gets fixed in the next version, it is a very confusing bug:)



Sign InorRegisterto comment.