Parameter persisten in operator ProcessLog
Legacy User
MemberPosts:0Newbie
Hi,
I've a question about the ProcessLog parameter "persistent". When I enable
it in sample "07_EvolutionaryParameterOptimization", the logfile
(specified by "filename" parameter) contains at the end just a single entry.
Otherwise, when the parameter is disabled, all intermediate computations
are correctly logged.
What is the reason for that? I enabled the parameter since I wanted to check
from time to time how far my validation is. But the parameter seems to have
a different meaning.
And do I free some memory when persistent=1? I mean when the results do not
have to be kept but can be immediately written to the logfile, less memory
should be consumed. Is that right?
Regards,
Tim
I've a question about the ProcessLog parameter "persistent". When I enable
it in sample "07_EvolutionaryParameterOptimization", the logfile
(specified by "filename" parameter) contains at the end just a single entry.
Otherwise, when the parameter is disabled, all intermediate computations
are correctly logged.
What is the reason for that? I enabled the parameter since I wanted to check
from time to time how far my validation is. But the parameter seems to have
a different meaning.
And do I free some memory when persistent=1? I mean when the results do not
have to be kept but can be immediately written to the logfile, less memory
should be consumed. Is that right?
Regards,
Tim
0
Answers
thanks for this hint. The persistent parameter should work as you expected. This bug has already been removed in the developer branch but has not been removed in the cvs stable version. I've done this.
Greetings,
Sebastian
do I get the recent version with the fixed bug when I check out the recent CVS version with
cvs -d:pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot/yale login
cvs -d:pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot/yale co -P yale ?
Regards,
Tim
yes, this should check out the HEAD revision of the module, i.e. the stable version (4.2) of RM. If you like, you can alternatively check out the branch Zaniah which contains our current development version.
Regards,
Tobias
I've now updated to Zaniah to check the fix in the persistent
parameter. When I now run the sample
07_Meta/07_EvolutionaryParameterOptimization.xml
I get the error message: This didn't happen in your stable RM version 4.2.
Can you reproduce this?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Tim
all issues with this process should now be settled in the latest updates.
Cheers,
Ingo